Courage, as Julia Angwin and Ami Fields-Meyer argue in their new book On Courage, is not a personality trait. It’s a skill — one that can be studied, broken down into component parts, and practiced. That reframing is the engine behind one of the more useful additions to the current wave of books grappling with democratic erosion and civic fear, and it separates On Courage from the shelf of similarly urgent titles it will inevitably be filed alongside.
The book grew out of Angwin and Fields-Meyer’s widely read New Yorker essay “So You Want to Be a Dissident?”, and it retains that piece’s core method: rather than offering abstract exhortations to “be brave,” the authors interviewed more than one hundred dissidents, organizers, and whistleblowers across dozens of countries and eras, then distilled what they found into sixteen practical lessons. The people profiled range widely — a Hong Kong student who risked prison for pro-democracy protest, a mother in a working-class Caracas neighborhood who broke publicly with the political movement she was raised inside, young activists in Cairo who staged a public stunt that helped destabilize a dictatorship, an unassuming immigrant who became an unlikely legal champion for a landmark civil rights law. Angwin, a Pulitzer-winning investigative journalist, and Fields-Meyer, a former White House policy advisor now at Harvard’s Kennedy School, bring complementary skill sets: reporting rigor paired with institutional fluency in how power actually moves.
What elevates On Courage above a simple anthology of inspiring profiles is its insistence on mechanism over mythology. The authors are explicit that they’re not interested in the “chosen one” narrative of dissent, where a uniquely fearless individual simply decides to act. Instead they trace the specific psychological and social scaffolding — community, ritual, small early risks that build tolerance for bigger ones, the deliberate management of fear rather than its elimination — that let ordinary people do extraordinary things. The book draws on movement research and even spiritual traditions to build out this framework, which gives it more intellectual heft than a typical self-help package while keeping the sixteen lessons genuinely actionable rather than merely aspirational.
Early response has been enthusiastic, with reviewers and endorsers highlighting the book’s timeliness without treating that as its only virtue — several have noted that the profiles themselves would make compelling reading independent of the framework built around them. Commentary has generally praised the authors for avoiding partisan flattening, since the dissidents profiled span political and cultural contexts far beyond any single country’s current headlines, which broadens the book’s applicability. Some early notes of caution have focused on whether the “sixteen lessons” structure occasionally over-systematizes experiences that resist tidy categorization, and whether readers outside activist or journalist circles will find the lessons as transferable to everyday civic life as the authors intend.
Whatever the answer to that last question, On Courage lands at a moment when a lot of readers are quietly asking themselves what they’d actually do if called on to take a risk for something they believe in. Angwin and Fields-Meyer don’t offer easy comfort, but they do offer something more durable: evidence, drawn from a hundred real lives, that courage is trainable. For anyone feeling the particular helplessness of the current moment, that’s a genuinely useful thing to be handed.
As an Amazon Associate, VIRA Broadcasting earns from qualifying purchases.