A quarter-century after its first printing, “Communion: The Female Search for Love” is back on the bestseller lists, not because of a splashy reissue campaign but because readers found it themselves and started passing it along. That’s a strange, quiet kind of comeback for a book, and it says something about how little the questions bell hooks was asking in 2002 have actually been answered.
“Communion” is the third book in hooks’ loose trilogy on love, following “All About Love” and “Salvation,” and it turns her attention specifically to women: how feminism changed what women expect from romantic partnership, how entry into the workforce reshaped women’s independence and their loneliness in equal measure, and how a self-help culture built around “loving yourself first” sometimes leaves women more isolated than before. hooks writes from a place of genuine reckoning. She isn’t interested in scoring points against feminism or defending it uncritically, but in asking why so many women who did everything the movement asked of them still feel like love is something they have to earn.
What’s always made hooks worth reading is the way she refuses to separate the personal from the political without losing either one. She moves fluidly between cultural criticism, feminist theory, and her own romantic history, and the book is strongest when she’s willing to be plainly autobiographical, describing her own patterns of choosing unavailable partners and her own difficulty accepting care. The prose is direct and unadorned in the way all of hooks’ popular work is, built for readers encountering these ideas for the first time as much as for people who’ve read her academic writing for decades. It is a short book that doesn’t waste time getting to its argument.
When “Communion” first appeared, reviewers treated it as a natural, if slightly less incendiary, extension of “All About Love,” praising hooks’ willingness to interrogate her own movement’s blind spots around intimacy and desire. Some critics found the second half looser than the first, arguing hooks’ turn toward a self-help register sits awkwardly next to her sharper cultural analysis. Its current resurgence has brought a new round of attention, much of it from readers who discovered the book through word of mouth rather than the review pages, and who point to its case for the daily, unglamorous work of “practicing love” as more useful now than the book’s original notices gave it credit for.
“Communion” isn’t hooks’ most famous book, but it might be her most practical one: an argument that the search for love is a discipline, not a stroke of luck, and that women have been taught to distrust their own claim to it. Two decades on, it reads less like a period piece than like a book that has finally found its moment.
As an Amazon Associate, VIRA Broadcasting earns from qualifying purchases.